Concealed Carry? - concealed carry handbag
What are your views on concealed carry? I think it's a wonderful idea. Only when a student or professor had a gun on TV, what would have happened. Or, if those who attacked or raped. I doubt that the criminals go very far if you even try, even though he knew that the person had a weapon. I know people think that when the arm comes to weapons, each giving the nuts and crazy. I thought a solution to this problem. all those who want to carry a weapon, must first pass the safety of firearms and a psychiatric evaluation before they can handle a weapon. Just think of the possibilities of the secret of success can be made. A reduction in crime is greatest. What I know is, what are their opinions and ideas about this? to be honest, I would like to know what you think of the idea suggested that defects or things could be improved. Tell me what you really think.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Concealed Carry Handbag Concealed Carry?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I live in Kennesaw, Georgia (metro Atlanta) - and every head of family does not (which is a criminal, mental retardation or a reasoned objection) must possess a weapon and ammunition - and that they can use. It is not important, but still on the books for more than two decades and a half na Greenleaf, Idaho, a similar regulation was (if the person receiving the poster to another).
I say there is no crime in my neighborhood. But I do not think it is for any person to carry concealed weapons on campus (or in school for some reason it is advisable).
Gun laws are hidden by the state, but 67.5% of the population lives in "U.S. law to carry out" areas.
http://www.gunlaws.com/links/
http://firearmsclasses.com/carry_facts.h ...
http://www.recguns.com/Sources/IIC1a2.ht ...
The arms of the band members are hidden. I think that's the point. Know when thieves and murderers around the world that they would steal carries a weapon, then they are less likely to commit violent crimes. At least that's the theory .... I'm sure there are lots of policemen in the city, because most of the armed gangs and will continue to kill each other like crazy, would not agree.
My personal opinion is that every system in this country are poor and would take their "hidden agenda" to. there are still many people who are not worthy and through unarmed citizens, are surrounded by the priveledge of carrying out a concealed weapon and deserves.
Moreover, the decision whether someone is trustworthy? Neo-conservatives could take control and not the right or the neocons other Democrats could do the same? Could it be paid a fee attached, which can earn the right to a rich person poor, but can not? And the victims in the war on drugs, that their rights have been devastated by drugsConviction .... be allowed to carry weapons?
I think this will only work if no restrictions or fees of any kind ..... at least everyone would be free to its 2nd Amendment right to keep and bare arms !!!!! Exercise
I do not think people should be a weapon if they want. which runs counter to some beliefs, after all, we live in a country "free".
Things can always be improved, but I think it certainly makes sense, as things are now fixed. lots of crazy people who are probably not long after purchasing a firearm. Moreover, it is difficult to obtain an illegal weapon in the streets. could receive an automatic 9 mm on the street for $ 100, when he was 13, and an automatic document feeder, 22 for $ 60.
which is much cheaper to buy a legal one, of course. not yet, but the point is that if someone really wants a gun can still get one, even if the law allows.
A west of the city (town) was on a news program, as some 20-20 times when the city is a law that everyone had a weapon of their own. The crime rate is significantly reduced.
Well, Let's face it, with corporal punishment, then what do bad master, is too late?
An armed population is educated population.
Take a look at the parts of the United States with the highest rates of crime and areas that have the most stringent laws to control firearms. See nyn Y and in Washington DC for example. It does not take a genius to understand that if honest citizens were armed, and do not know the criminal, who is and is not armed, crime is falling. As things criminals have the advantage that they break the law anyway, why not another. And they know that the courts are ineffective.
Talk about the fall in trouble! Would you all postal employees are, too? It would be like the Wild West, with people shooting at the other "by accident". Do you think gang members volunteered on the security of firearms, or who take a psychiatric evaluation?
Post a Comment